You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘murder’ tag.

There is a Duane Reade (New York’s Walgreens or CVS equivalent) that we normally go to, not too far from my house. There used to be a small, high-end grocery and delicatessen right next door. It seemed, from the time it opened, that it had a pretty large following, so its closing about a year and a half ago was a bit unexpected. In that area, there tends to be a high turnover of stores and small restaurants, so I figured something new would take its place soon enough. Today, the space still has not been filled. I think that’s probably when I first started to get scared.

I think I’ve railed against Long Island a lot, when it comes to their feeling of invincibility owing to the region’s staggering wealth (with some exceptions). Three years ago, I rode on the LIRR through the whole summer, and the conversations among other passengers were mostly monotonous, vapid, or sometimes (on those rare occasions) riotously funny. Now, some of that conversation has turned somber, speculative, and almost scared (don’t get me wrong, there are still those who manage to carry on the vapid and stupid conversations in spite of anything else). I’m seeing large sales and discounts popping up to lure uncertain buyers. New York/Long Island mainstays (like Fortunoff and Steve and Barry’s) have filed for bankruptcy, and both are (or have completed) the process of liquidation. At the supermarket, the number of people using coupons seems to have increased exponentially. Even big-wig restaurant owners and chefs in the city (Mario Batali et. al.) have started to introduce special discounts at their restaurants that were normally only accessible to a select few with deep pockets (though I think the discounts were only through Restaurant Week, I don’t know about now).

On the other end of the spectrum, though, things like train fares (both commuter and subway) have been poised to increase over the next few months (I believe June is when the MTA is hiking up subway fares), making a more environmentally-sound (and sometimes, cost-effective) form of transportation more expensive. Schools are (still) hiking tuition costs at a rate that’s outpacing inflation (hooray for debt!), though some are increasing their financial aid packages in light of the fact that people are less likely to be able to pay for further education now than perhaps a few years ago.

So essentially I’m stuck in a slightly confused world where some are lowering costs, and others are increasing costs, and I’m struggling to keep whatever little money I have on my person. I try to cut down the amount of coffee I consume outside (such a hard habit to break) the number of times I eat out (another hard habit to break), and the number of times I have to go into the city, trying to plan my trips around off-peak hours for the sake of my wallet (though sometimes traveling at peak hours is unavoidable).

I was riding into the city on one of the Babylon LIRR trains and was listening to a conversation the two men sitting in front of me were having. They were speaking in hushed tones about how, given the state of affairs, crime was very likely to rise in the area. It was a rehashing of a similar conversation I had with my father. As much as I’d like to think that they are being incredibly paranoid, they’re all probably right.

Whenever I leave Penn Station, I walk out and make my way to Herald Square so I can catch the R or W to NYU. For the last couple of weeks, I’ve noticed that there is always one wheelchair-bound hobo at the corner of 34th and 7th uttering the same thing, over and over again. “Guys, can ya please help me get som’in ta’ eat?” Hobos are as part of the city as the Empire State Building and Times Square, but generally I never saw many, at least on the route I normally take through the city. Now–perhaps because there are more or because I’m taking greater notice of them–I have seen an increase in the number of hobos and street performers. At that corner just outside of Penn Station, I have seen on some days, two other wheelchair-bound hobos patrolling that intersection, hoping someone will give them something. The West 4th Station has seen an increase in performers who, sometimes, go to great lengths to attract attention (a full jazz band and a guy playing on a regular piano, for starters). The worst I have seen (at least to me) in recent weeks are the rise of teenage (or perhaps younger) street performers. On the F, I have seen on at least two occasions, a group of kids who breakdance on the moving train for money. I can’t deny that it’s entertaining, but I mean, they’re kids! I don’t know if this was their own choice, or their parents or friends put them up to this, but God forbid one of them fell and broke their neck…

Yet getting back to crime, in desperate times, desperate people will make desperate moves. More people are being driven into poverty, some ending up on the streets. It’s almost understandable that crime would be the next step. I don’t know if I can ever entirely trust the media coverage of local crimes, since it seems like crime activity in an area is always inflated for sensationalist value, but I guess it’s better to be safe than sorry. Usually, when I’m walking to and from the subway, I try to walk with someone. It’s not a terribly long walk, so I don’t mind walking alone sometimes, and usually the streets are very well-lit and well-trafficked. However, I have considered buying pepper spray, just in case I do end up staying later (for class, studying, or just in general), when the streets become less crowded. I’m not exactly a formidable figure, at 5’1″.

So at least here in the Long Island/NYC area, the recession has been moving in like a fog through empty streets, slowly and steadily. I suppose there’s no way to predict where this will take us, absolutely, but I hope that this will only be a temporary situation and that an upturn will start within the next few months. I can only hope.

Have you ever thought about the odds from dying from reason x or y? I wouldn’t be surprised if you haven’t, but I’m sure it’s something that has crossed your mind at some point. A friend of mine sent me a link that gives the odds of dying from a whole host of possible causes. While it is kind of depressing to consider each and every scenario, this link also puts things into perspective, given a news media that seems to always be reporting deaths from this crash or that fall (perhaps it’s only the American media that’s guilty of that).

The odds are given as one-year odds (for 2005) and lifetime odds (for people born in 2005). Most of the data represents a compilation of data from several injury categories. These categories are defined by the World Health Organization (WHO).

Most striking (and perhaps most unsurprisingly) are the lifetime odds of dying as either a pedestrian or as a car occupant: 1 in 627 and 1 in 261, respectively. So what this translates to is 1 out of every 627 people will die due to their being a pedestrian, and 1 out of 261 people will die as an occupant in a car over the course of their life. Given that there are some 300 million people in the U.S., that’s a lot of people. Yet this graph doesn’t really give odds of dying in a car-related accident due to other influences, like alcohol, drugs, medical condition, or distraction (Blackberry, cell phones, etc.). The odds represented here are compiled odds. Accounting for all of those factors would probably lessen the odds considerably. The lifetime odds of death due to air travel–a cause of great fear in a lot of people–sits at a comfortable 1 in 6,460. Whether this is because fewer people fly or air travel is more stringently regulated is up for debate, though I’d be willing to go with the latter.

The lifetime odds of death due to injuries or complications sustained as a result of medical interventions is 1 in 1,437. Again, the reason for death isn’t specified, whether due to medical malpractice or a physiological response to a treatment (like organ rejection, for example). The data represented is a compilation of deaths due to a whole host of causes that fall under the umbrella of medical interventions.

These should be taken with a grain of salt, given that for many of these causes of death, there are usually other factors involved. Nonetheless, most represent a decent estimate of one’s odds of dying from any given cause.

In the context of a media that seems to be fixated on deaths from murders, accidents, and suicides, we need to understand the real facts. I hate that I have to differentiate between real facts and mainstream-news-media-drivel. For those of you who haven’t seen “Bowling for Columbine,” I would highly recommend it for the sheer reason that it points out the disparity in news coverage between the U.S. and Canada, with the former being far more sensationalist. Based on the news given in the U.S., it would seem like people are dying from causes at far greater rates than would be predicted by the actual, calculated odds. It’s grossly misleading.

Obviously it’s good to know the risks of certain activities (or the odds, as are presented here, both are similar but are derived differently), yet it shouldn’t cause us to forego things because they carry an inherent risk (though assault and premeditated murders should really be avoided…among other things). It’s a question of weighing the risks and the benefits, and understanding what factors can reduce the risk of undertaking a certain activity.

So go live life…but be mindful of the facts.

sospokesaroj on Twitter

Blog Stats

  • 80,198 hits
Add to Technorati Favorites
My BlogCatalog BlogRank
free counters wishlist


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.